| Author |
 Topic  |
|
on a fishin mission
Senior Member
1422 Posts |
 Posted - 03/16/2012 : 02:35:20 AM
|
quote:
Originally posted by gotchacovered
OnaFishinMission,
That is the quite possibly the silliest cop out/side-step I've ever heard one use to evade admitting that the beloved President, for whom you voted, and his party, are more worthy of your hateful words than even the "fat POS, waste of air" Rush.
First, I didn't ask you how the system works. We all know how it works, and that doesn't justify anything--especially when your beloved are abusing that system to stomp on the Constitution. I asked you what YOU think about the people PUSHING that particular agenda and making it a reality. That is 100% the Democratic Party, President Obama, and people like Sandra Fluke. You typically defend all three. You obviously can't be honest and criticize them as they deserve.
Second, and more importantly, YOU ARE WRONG about the "system" anyway. The birth-control mandate on Christian employers was not an act of Congress. It was an ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY, announced THIS YEAR by Kathleen Sebilius, head of the Department of Health and Human Services. After backlash from the public, it was altered through another ADMINISTRATIVE decision--not by a court or a Legislature. It is THAT that this fiasco is aimed at defending.
You need to get your facts straight, senior.
So, now, what you've told us ALL without realizing it, is that you support Democrats, and refuse to admit to their flaws, EVEN WHEN YOU KNOW they are trampling our Constitutional rights. You're "outraged" because a Conservative shock jockey called THEM names ( ) over THAT gross abuse of the FUNDMENTALS of our liberty and CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, but you have the nerve to try and use the "it's her Constitutional right to speak" to defend Obama's activist against Rush's name-calling, based on the claim that it's "un-Christian"--all while you call Rush names like "POS" and "waste of air".
The display of hypocrisy is complete. You may now exit to stage left.
Gotcha Covered,
Lee Strickland
Strickland Marine Insurance Agency, Inc.
https://stricklandmarine.net
843-795-1000 / 800-446-1862
And how is this wrong about how our government works? Every president makes administrative policies and every congress can block those policies with 50 votes in the senate The senate tried to kill the contraceptive policy and only got 48 votes. That is the way it has worked for 100's of years. What part do you not understand. Now congress can amend the bill to kill the coverage and bring it back to the senate for another vote or it can send it to the supreme court.
Blunt, Romney's liaison to Congress, predicted the issue won't go away.
It "won't be over until the administration figures out how to accommodate people's religious views at it relates to these mandates," he told reporters after the vote. "This is a debate that might be settled at that building across the street," referring to ethe Supreme Court.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/story/2012-03-01/birth-control-politics/53313252/1
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/02/us/politics/senate-kills-gop-bill-opposing-contraception-policy.html?pagewanted=all
Even Fox news understands how our system works, even if they don't believe in the bill itself
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/03/01/first-senate-vote-looms-on-obama-birth-control-policy/
Lets be honest here, you are having a hard time understanding
how our government works, I thought this might help you understand, helped my 4 year old alot.
"Those who have the ability to make a difference have the responsibility to do so." Thomas Jefferson |
Edited by - on a fishin mission on 03/16/2012 02:53:05 AM |
 |
|
|
on a fishin mission
Senior Member
1422 Posts |
Posted - 03/16/2012 : 03:17:15 AM
|
quote:
Originally posted by Mixed Nutz
I never meant sexual favors, but rather selling one's soul to the Democratic Party at the expense of the Constitution of the U.S.
Example:(prostitute) to devote to corrupt for unworthy purposes : debase <prostitute one's talents>
Now, how's that hat tasting?
I'm quite sure the the next time the PT Pulosi,'Bama and Biden Circus comes around, she'll play a much higher role.
Maybe Ring Leader rather than Freak Show?
...Politicians aren't the "Oldest Profession", but the results are still the same!!!
Very good use of merriam webster.com. Now you should go back there and find out the difference in a noun and a verb. In the sentence She's a "SLUT", "prostitute", or a "Jesabelle", (according to Gospel) bought and paid for by the Democratic Party!! slut, prostitute and jesabelle are all nouns. the definition of a prostitute as a noun is
1 : a woman who engages in promiscuous sexual intercourse especially for money : whore b : a male who engages in sexual and especially ********** practices for money
2
: a person (as a writer or painter) who deliberately debases his or her talents (as for money)
The definition of a slut is
1
chiefly British : a slovenly woman
2
a : a promiscuous woman; especially : prostitute
You, sir, used all of those words as nouns, which is slander. So until you can prove to me she is a prostitute or a slut, you are dead ass wrong!!!
Good try though!
"Those who have the ability to make a difference have the responsibility to do so." Thomas Jefferson |
|
|
|
skinneej
Prolific Poster
11907 Posts |
Posted - 03/16/2012 : 06:37:39 AM
|
| Slander or libel? :) |
|
|
|
on a fishin mission
Senior Member
1422 Posts |
Posted - 03/16/2012 : 06:47:30 AM
|
quote:
Originally posted by skinneej
Slander or libel? :)
Call it what you want, both will get your ass sued.
"Those who have the ability to make a difference have the responsibility to do so." Thomas Jefferson |
|
|
|
on a fishin mission
Senior Member
1422 Posts |
Posted - 03/16/2012 : 06:54:11 AM
|
quote:
Originally posted by Mixed Nutz
And, I never said that I was a "Good Christian", although I try very hard!!
...Politicians aren't the "Oldest Profession", but the results are still the same!!!
quote:
EAT IT Mo'Fo'!!
I think you need to try alot harder!
I have asked you several time and you refuse to answer.
How does calling a person a slut a prostitute and now me, a person you disagree with, a mother ****er play into being a good christian?
"Those who have the ability to make a difference have the responsibility to do so." Thomas Jefferson |
|
|
|
skinneej
Prolific Poster
11907 Posts |
Posted - 03/16/2012 : 07:02:02 AM
|
| Negative. The burden lies in proving damages. People get called sluts every day. Can't claim that I have ever heard anyone getting sued over it. |
|
|
|
on a fishin mission
Senior Member
1422 Posts |
Posted - 03/16/2012 : 07:39:36 AM
|
Remember Strauss-Kahn? The maid sued the NY Post for calling her a prostitute. The Post asked a judge to throw it out and it didn't happen. My understanding is it is going to trial.
"Those who have the ability to make a difference have the responsibility to do so." Thomas Jefferson |
|
|
|
gotchacovered
Prolific Poster
18081 Posts |
Posted - 03/16/2012 : 08:20:04 AM
|
quote:
Originally posted by on a fishin mission
quote:
Originally posted by gotchacovered
OnaFishinMission,
That is the quite possibly the silliest cop out/side-step I've ever heard one use to evade admitting that the beloved President, for whom you voted, and his party, are more worthy of your hateful words than even the "fat POS, waste of air" Rush.
First, I didn't ask you how the system works. We all know how it works, and that doesn't justify anything--especially when your beloved are abusing that system to stomp on the Constitution. I asked you what YOU think about the people PUSHING that particular agenda and making it a reality. That is 100% the Democratic Party, President Obama, and people like Sandra Fluke. You typically defend all three. You obviously can't be honest and criticize them as they deserve.
Second, and more importantly, YOU ARE WRONG about the "system" anyway. The birth-control mandate on Christian employers was not an act of Congress. It was an ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY, announced THIS YEAR by Kathleen Sebilius, head of the Department of Health and Human Services. After backlash from the public, it was altered through another ADMINISTRATIVE decision--not by a court or a Legislature. It is THAT that this fiasco is aimed at defending.
You need to get your facts straight, senior.
So, now, what you've told us ALL without realizing it, is that you support Democrats, and refuse to admit to their flaws, EVEN WHEN YOU KNOW they are trampling our Constitutional rights. You're "outraged" because a Conservative shock jockey called THEM names () over THAT gross abuse of the FUNDMENTALS of our liberty and CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, but you have the nerve to try and use the "it's her Constitutional right to speak" to defend Obama's activist against Rush's name-calling, based on the claim that it's "un-Christian"--all while you call Rush names like "POS" and "waste of air".
The display of hypocrisy is complete. You may now exit to stage left.
Gotcha Covered,
Lee Strickland
Strickland Marine Insurance Agency, Inc.
https://stricklandmarine.net
843-795-1000 / 800-446-1862
And how is this wrong about how our government works? Every president makes administrative policies and every congress can block those policies with 50 votes in the senate The senate tried to kill the contraceptive policy and only got 48 votes. That is the way it has worked for 100's of years. What part do you not understand. Now congress can amend the bill to kill the coverage and bring it back to the senate for another vote or it can send it to the supreme court.
Blunt, Romney's liaison to Congress, predicted the issue won't go away.
It "won't be over until the administration figures out how to accommodate people's religious views at it relates to these mandates," he told reporters after the vote. "This is a debate that might be settled at that building across the street," referring to ethe Supreme Court.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/story/2012-03-01/birth-control-politics/53313252/1
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/02/us/politics/senate-kills-gop-bill-opposing-contraception-policy.html?pagewanted=all
Even Fox news understands how our system works, even if they don't believe in the bill itself
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/03/01/first-senate-vote-looms-on-obama-birth-control-policy/
Lets be honest here, you are having a hard time understanding
how our government works, I thought this might help you understand, helped my 4 year old alot.
"Those who have the ability to make a difference have the responsibility to do so." Thomas Jefferson
"And how is this wrong about how our government works?"
It's wrong in that you said that CONGRESS installed the policy. You are WRONG. The PRESIDENT made the policy AFTER Congress passed Obamacare. Now, I fully expect you to spin your original comment as hard as possible, call me names, or make more false accusations about my understanding of how government works, in an attempt to hide your error, but intelligent readers aren't going to fall for it.
My desire is not to pound you for making a mistake, though. Everyone does. The point is that the President you elected is trampling on Constitutional rights and religious freedom, and you apparently can't criticize him for it. You call a Conservative radio host a "POS waste of air" for stating his opinions in metaphor about a left0wing activist who's trying to destroy the very foundation of our liberty, but you claim holier-than-thou status when called to analyze the true villains in the story.
Typical.
Oh, I almost forgot. Here's that picture you posted.
Yep, that's exactly the thing I'm defending from YOU here, as you stand up for those who use it as a condom on the American People.
Gotcha Covered,
Lee Strickland
Strickland Marine Insurance Agency, Inc.
https://stricklandmarine.net
843-795-1000 / 800-446-1862 |
Edited by - gotchacovered on 03/16/2012 08:25:06 AM |
|
|
|
gotchacovered
Prolific Poster
18081 Posts |
Posted - 03/16/2012 : 08:29:44 AM
|
quote:
Originally posted by on a fishin mission
quote:
Originally posted by Mixed Nutz
I never meant sexual favors, but rather selling one's soul to the Democratic Party at the expense of the Constitution of the U.S.
Example:(prostitute) to devote to corrupt for unworthy purposes : debase <prostitute one's talents>
Now, how's that hat tasting?
I'm quite sure the the next time the PT Pulosi,'Bama and Biden Circus comes around, she'll play a much higher role.
Maybe Ring Leader rather than Freak Show?
...Politicians aren't the "Oldest Profession", but the results are still the same!!!
Very good use of merriam webster.com. Now you should go back there and find out the difference in a noun and a verb. In the sentence She's a "SLUT", "prostitute", or a "Jesabelle", (according to Gospel) bought and paid for by the Democratic Party!! slut, prostitute and jesabelle are all nouns. the definition of a prostitute as a noun is
1 : a woman who engages in promiscuous sexual intercourse especially for money : whore b : a male who engages in sexual and especially ********** practices for money
2
: a person (as a writer or painter) who deliberately debases his or her talents (as for money)
The definition of a slut is
1
chiefly British : a slovenly woman
2
a : a promiscuous woman; especially : prostitute
You, sir, used all of those words as nouns, which is slander. So until you can prove to me she is a prostitute or a slut, you are dead ass wrong!!!
Good try though!
"Those who have the ability to make a difference have the responsibility to do so." Thomas Jefferson
Wow, OFM, it's like you just can't help but reveal the plank in his eye while prouncing others' specks.
Here you are making a nit-pick argument about someone's use of the dictionary over noun versus adjective, and within your criticism you can't even get slander versus libel straight. You err while pointing out another's error of similar kind. It's like when you call Rush hash names while you complain about him calling someone else harsh names. You honestly don't see this? You walk right into your own criticism almost evey single time you click "submit". You really need to stop setting yourself up like that.
Gotcha Covered,
Lee Strickland
Strickland Marine Insurance Agency, Inc.
https://stricklandmarine.net
843-795-1000 / 800-446-1862 |
Edited by - gotchacovered on 03/16/2012 08:32:04 AM |
|
|
|
gotchacovered
Prolific Poster
18081 Posts |
Posted - 03/16/2012 : 08:37:05 AM
|
quote:
Originally posted by on a fishin mission
quote:
Originally posted by Mixed Nutz
And, I never said that I was a "Good Christian", although I try very hard!!
...Politicians aren't the "Oldest Profession", but the results are still the same!!!
quote:
EAT IT Mo'Fo'!!
I think you need to try alot harder!
I have asked you several time and you refuse to answer.
How does calling a person a slut a prostitute and now me, a person you disagree with, a mother ****er play into being a good christian?
"Those who have the ability to make a difference have the responsibility to do so." Thomas Jefferson
While you're asking Mixed Nutz if he's a good Christian, why not answer MY question about YOU?
Are YOU a Christian, OFM?
If so, is it a "good-Christian" thing to do when you call people "fat POS, waste of air, junkie" or when you make false statements about what positions people have taken, or when you slur the integrity someone's faith?
This whole time, I've been trying to get you to see how the ONE standard is meant to apply in BOTH directions.
Gotcha Covered,
Lee Strickland
Strickland Marine Insurance Agency, Inc.
https://stricklandmarine.net
843-795-1000 / 800-446-1862 |
|
|
|
gotchacovered
Prolific Poster
18081 Posts |
Posted - 03/16/2012 : 08:49:29 AM
|
quote:
Originally posted by on a fishin mission
Remember Strauss-Kahn? The maid sued the NY Post for calling her a prostitute. The Post asked a judge to throw it out and it didn't happen. My understanding is it is going to trial.
"Those who have the ability to make a difference have the responsibility to do so." Thomas Jefferson
Strauss-Kahn was about real accusations that were meant to be taken as literal, factual, serious, and credible. Allegations of sexual assault on the maid were also involed. The maid said she was sexually assaulted upon entering a man's room, and he alleged that she was a prostitute making a call--not a figurative, political prostitute, and not a vertiable slut because she consumed so many contraceptives, but just a plain, old call girl who was there to do real business.
Rush's comments were not of that nature at all. They were obviously figurative and metaphorical, not meant to be taken literally in the sense of Sandra Fluke actually standing on a street corner, and not meant to be credible like a court testimony or a newspaper article, but only meant to make a politial statement. They were a self-confessed rant against a purely-political drama wherein one party put on a dog-and-pony show to manipulate public perception. See below.
"RUSH: What does it say about the college co-ed Sandra Fluke, who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex, what does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex. She's having so much sex she can't afford the contraception. She wants you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex. What does that make us? We're the pimps. (interruption) The johns? We would be the johns? No! We're not the johns. (interruption) Yeah, that's right. Pimp's not the right word. Okay, so she's not a slut. She's "round heeled." I take it back."
He was obviously talking about how she metaphorically prostituted herself in this POLITICAL matter. Relatively no one thinks that Sandra Fluke is actually selling her body to street johns because of Rush Limbaugh's statements. Intelligent, honest people know that he was making a political point, not a credible judgment of Sandra Flukes night life for hire. Not only that, but what was the damage? She might be able to claim emotional damage. That's possible, but what about the GAIN she's gotten from it? The woman was a relative nobody until Rush made her famous, and now she's probably going to get a book deal or end up as a news analyst on CNN or a cabinet member in the 2013 Obama administration. If she lost some money or respect after the Rush comments, maybe she'd have a better suit. Instead, she got a personal call from the President of the United States and a live slot on national news broadcasts.
In other words, it appears that this played out EXACTLY as the Democrats--and SHE--PLANNED it!! Talk about how the system works? Well, THAT's how it REALLY works--hollywood-style drama.
I hope she does sue him, because two good things could come of it. In the attempt to prove his case, Rush could put a PI on her and prove that she IS a slut, which would be so gratifying to the right. If she won, though, it might slow down all the REAL slander and libel in this country--much of which is perpetrated by people you defend--a little more, which would be an even better thing. Nahhhh, we all know that slanderand libel almost never applies to Liberal slanderers. Bill Maher and 100 other like him are safe.
You never know, though. Of Sandra sets a precedent, maybe people like you would ease up on slandering and libeling others. Nahhhh, if you already do it while complaining about others doing it, then it probably wouldn't make a difference.
Liberals go soooooooooooo far to swallow the camels of the left and strain the gnats of the right. It gets so old.
Gotcha Covered,
Lee Strickland
Strickland Marine Insurance Agency, Inc.
https://stricklandmarine.net
843-795-1000 / 800-446-1862 |
Edited by - gotchacovered on 03/16/2012 09:17:08 AM |
|
|
|
gotchacovered
Prolific Poster
18081 Posts |
Posted - 03/16/2012 : 09:25:16 AM
|
Let's put this whole thing in a neat little package.
DNC: "Psssst. Hey, Sandra, we need to gain back some points for Obama after that clash with the Catholic Church, so we're going to put you on a mock stand, get you to 'testify' [wink, wink] before 'Congress' [wink, wink] about how your Catholic school is abusing you on birth-control coverage, and get you to make a case in support of forced coverage for contraceptives under Obamacare laws. Then, the Conservative shock jockeys will, predictably, start calling you names, and we'll shift the attention onto THEM, and use their name-calling to convince America that Conservatives hate WOMEN, thus boosting Barry toward re-election later this year!!" [Please note that the foregoing quote is meant to be taken as an assessment of what I think happened in this fiasco, not as a factual quote of something I heard or read the DNC actually say.]
I must admit. It is an ingenious plan--evil and dishonest, but ingenious. The one problem is that they do the same thing just about every time, and they are the biggest name-callers in the sport. They are still successful because (a) most people don't pay close enough attention, (b) most don't remember things long enough to spot the hypocrisy, (c) Liberals will defend them and refuse to criticize them no matter what, and (c) the news media are in their corner.
Gotcha Covered,
Lee Strickland
Strickland Marine Insurance Agency, Inc.
https://stricklandmarine.net
843-795-1000 / 800-446-1862 |
Edited by - gotchacovered on 03/16/2012 09:27:24 AM |
|
|
|
Fred67
Senior Member
3376 Posts |
Posted - 03/16/2012 : 10:07:41 AM
|
Gotcha, if your not 100% on that statement, your only off by .01%. But our liberal group will take that .01% and twist it to 99.99%.
Good summery to 11 pages.
< Evil is simply the absence of God > |
|
|
|
hhi angler
Senior Member
2131 Posts |
Posted - 03/16/2012 : 10:20:40 AM
|
| Little doubt the DNC staged this deal. Rush should have spent more money on research and less on ex wifes and he would not have wound up being a libtard punching bag. |
|
|
|
on a fishin mission
Senior Member
1422 Posts |
Posted - 03/16/2012 : 11:02:54 AM
|
quote:
Originally posted by gotchacovered
quote:
Originally posted by on a fishin mission
quote:
Originally posted by gotchacovered
OnaFishinMission,
That is the quite possibly the silliest cop out/side-step I've ever heard one use to evade admitting that the beloved President, for whom you voted, and his party, are more worthy of your hateful words than even the "fat POS, waste of air" Rush.
First, I didn't ask you how the system works. We all know how it works, and that doesn't justify anything--especially when your beloved are abusing that system to stomp on the Constitution. I asked you what YOU think about the people PUSHING that particular agenda and making it a reality. That is 100% the Democratic Party, President Obama, and people like Sandra Fluke. You typically defend all three. You obviously can't be honest and criticize them as they deserve.
Second, and more importantly, YOU ARE WRONG about the "system" anyway. The birth-control mandate on Christian employers was not an act of Congress. It was an ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY, announced THIS YEAR by Kathleen Sebilius, head of the Department of Health and Human Services. After backlash from the public, it was altered through another ADMINISTRATIVE decision--not by a court or a Legislature. It is THAT that this fiasco is aimed at defending.
You need to get your facts straight, senior.
So, now, what you've told us ALL without realizing it, is that you support Democrats, and refuse to admit to their flaws, EVEN WHEN YOU KNOW they are trampling our Constitutional rights. You're "outraged" because a Conservative shock jockey called THEM names () over THAT gross abuse of the FUNDMENTALS of our liberty and CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, but you have the nerve to try and use the "it's her Constitutional right to speak" to defend Obama's activist against Rush's name-calling, based on the claim that it's "un-Christian"--all while you call Rush names like "POS" and "waste of air".
The display of hypocrisy is complete. You may now exit to stage left.
Gotcha Covered,
Lee Strickland
Strickland Marine Insurance Agency, Inc.
https://stricklandmarine.net
843-795-1000 / 800-446-1862
And how is this wrong about how our government works? Every president makes administrative policies and every congress can block those policies with 50 votes in the senate The senate tried to kill the contraceptive policy and only got 48 votes. That is the way it has worked for 100's of years. What part do you not understand. Now congress can amend the bill to kill the coverage and bring it back to the senate for another vote or it can send it to the supreme court.
Blunt, Romney's liaison to Congress, predicted the issue won't go away.
It "won't be over until the administration figures out how to accommodate people's religious views at it relates to these mandates," he told reporters after the vote. "This is a debate that might be settled at that building across the street," referring to ethe Supreme Court.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/story/2012-03-01/birth-control-politics/53313252/1
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/02/us/politics/senate-kills-gop-bill-opposing-contraception-policy.html?pagewanted=all
Even Fox news understands how our system works, even if they don't believe in the bill itself
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/03/01/first-senate-vote-looms-on-obama-birth-control-policy/
Lets be honest here, you are having a hard time understanding
how our government works, I thought this might help you understand, helped my 4 year old alot.
"Those who have the ability to make a difference have the responsibility to do so." Thomas Jefferson
"And how is this wrong about how our government works?"
It's wrong in that you said that CONGRESS installed the policy. You are WRONG. The PRESIDENT made the policy AFTER Congress passed Obamacare. Now, I fully expect you to spin your original comment as hard as possible, call me names, or make more false accusations about my understanding of how government works, in an attempt to hide your error, but intelligent readers aren't going to fall for it.
My desire is not to pound you for making a mistake, though. Everyone does. The point is that the President you elected is trampling on Constitutional rights and religious freedom, and you apparently can't criticize him for it. You call a Conservative radio host a "POS waste of air" for stating his opinions in metaphor about a left0wing activist who's trying to destroy the very foundation of our liberty, but you claim holier-than-thou status when called to analyze the true villains in the story.
Typical.
Oh, I almost forgot. Here's that picture you posted.
Yep, that's exactly the thing I'm defending from YOU here, as you stand up for those who use it as a condom on the American People.
Gotcha Covered,
Lee Strickland
Strickland Marine Insurance Agency, Inc.
https://stricklandmarine.net
843-795-1000 / 800-446-1862
Congress passed the bill and the administration added policy. It is still the way government works. You are arguing about details, all to which I say is how the government works.
Two questions for you and I want you to answer it. Did Congress break any laws in passing the healthcare bill? Yes or no please
Did the President break any laws in adding administrative policies to the bill? Yes or no.
"Those who have the ability to make a difference have the responsibility to do so." Thomas Jefferson |
Edited by - on a fishin mission on 03/16/2012 2:26:21 PM |
|
|
|
on a fishin mission
Senior Member
1422 Posts |
Posted - 03/16/2012 : 11:13:48 AM
|
quote:
Originally posted by gotchacovered
quote:
Originally posted by on a fishin mission
quote:
Originally posted by Mixed Nutz
I never meant sexual favors, but rather selling one's soul to the Democratic Party at the expense of the Constitution of the U.S.
Example:(prostitute) to devote to corrupt for unworthy purposes : debase <prostitute one's talents>
Now, how's that hat tasting?
I'm quite sure the the next time the PT Pulosi,'Bama and Biden Circus comes around, she'll play a much higher role.
Maybe Ring Leader rather than Freak Show?
...Politicians aren't the "Oldest Profession", but the results are still the same!!!
Very good use of merriam webster.com. Now you should go back there and find out the difference in a noun and a verb. In the sentence She's a "SLUT", "prostitute", or a "Jesabelle", (according to Gospel) bought and paid for by the Democratic Party!! slut, prostitute and jesabelle are all nouns. the definition of a prostitute as a noun is
1 : a woman who engages in promiscuous sexual intercourse especially for money : whore b : a male who engages in sexual and especially ********** practices for money
2
: a person (as a writer or painter) who deliberately debases his or her talents (as for money)
The definition of a slut is
1
chiefly British : a slovenly woman
2
a : a promiscuous woman; especially : prostitute
You, sir, used all of those words as nouns, which is slander. So until you can prove to me she is a prostitute or a slut, you are dead ass wrong!!!
Good try though!
"Those who have the ability to make a difference have the responsibility to do so." Thomas Jefferson
Wow, OFM, it's like you just can't help but reveal the plank in his eye while prouncing others' specks.
Here you are making a nit-pick argument about someone's use of the dictionary over noun versus adjective, and within your criticism you can't even get slander versus libel straight. You err while pointing out another's error of similar kind. It's like when you call Rush hash names while you complain about him calling someone else harsh names. You honestly don't see this? You walk right into your own criticism almost evey single time you click "submit". You really need to stop setting yourself up like that.
Gotcha Covered,
Lee Strickland
Strickland Marine Insurance Agency, Inc.
https://stricklandmarine.net
843-795-1000 / 800-446-1862
I really do have your goat! gotta anyswer other peoples questions now. Trying so hard to prove me wrong that are willing to argue that mispresenting a noun as a verb, giving the wrong definition as part of you argument is ok and valid.
Slander/libel, same context, one is written and one is spoken spoken.
Libel and slander are both forms of defamation. Now please show me where nouns are forms of verbs or verbs are forms of nouns and I will let you off the hook.
Keep grapsing, taking up for your cheerleader and I will happily keep my finger on your button.
"Those who have the ability to make a difference have the responsibility to do so." Thomas Jefferson |
|
|
|
gotchacovered
Prolific Poster
18081 Posts |
Posted - 03/16/2012 : 11:53:39 AM
|
I've never had a goat to get, OFM, but if I did, you would be far from taking it. I truth, I think everyone here knows that the opposite is the truth, which is almost always the case when a Liberal defends another Liberal. I've never even met Mixed Nutz in person, and he and I have disagreed at times. He's only one of MANY people reading this, thinking your argument is in left field. Several have "cheered" me on for one reason--I happen to be right, and you happen to be hypocritically wrong.
This is quite possibly the easiest moral and intellectual victory over the Liberal position in which I've ever partaken. If you still can't see or admit the error of your double-standards and plank-eyed judgment, honestly, I am not surprised. If all that matters is your own opinion of who deserves to be called a name and who doesn't, well, I just hope you never get into a position of judicial or legislative authority. The scary part is that people with similar double-standard values are already there, using Hollywood-style skits, with activists dressed as victims, to manipulate the country, own power, and walk on our Constitution like a door mat. They are there because people like you put them there. Call me what you want, but I hope you will at least rethink the sanity of voting for someone (AGAIN) who is bent on destroying Constitutional rights. I would hope for you to join the unified of patriots, like those stand-up Conservatives here, calling DOWN the deplorable assault on fundamental American Liberty and values that the current administration is presently perpetrating, but it is clear to me that you choose silence and partisan fidelity over such virtue.
Have a nice day, and remember, I'll never call you a "waste of air", because that is even wose than calling you a political slut.
Gotcha Covered,
Lee Strickland
Strickland Marine Insurance Agency, Inc.
https://stricklandmarine.net
843-795-1000 / 800-446-1862 |
Edited by - gotchacovered on 03/16/2012 12:07:27 PM |
|
|
|
on a fishin mission
Senior Member
1422 Posts |
Posted - 03/16/2012 : 2:16:07 PM
|
Gotcha, you didn't answer my questions.
"Those who have the ability to make a difference have the responsibility to do so." Thomas Jefferson |
|
|
|
gotchacovered
Prolific Poster
18081 Posts |
Posted - 03/16/2012 : 2:43:34 PM
|
?? With as many of my questions that you have blown off and still not answered, you want to talk about answering questions? Seriously?
Here are just two of many that I have posted. Still waiting.
Forceably stripping one of his Constitutional right to religion freedom through government control is at least as bad as SAYING some harsh things on the radio, isn't it?
Afterall, isn't the President SWORN to UPHOLD the Constitution?
Make your answer "Yes" or "No" this time, please.
I'll gladly answer your questions. I overlooked them before because you were babbling the same old nonsense. Looking back a couple of posts, I'm assuming that the following two questions are the ones you are talking about.
"Did Congress break any laws in passing the healthcare bill? Yes or no please
Did the President break any laws in adding administrative policies to the bill? Yes or no."
I don't know. Congress arguably violated the Constitution, the President most definitely DID violate the Constitution, but I don't know if that is technically breaking the "law" if you're going to quibble over the difference between the Constitution, their oaths to uphold it, and the law. Perhaps, they didn't violate any law created by the legislature, but the Constitution is a default law of the land, so YES, that was violated for sure, at least by the President. I will leave the judgment on Congress to the court.
Now, to keep you from distracting us even further, I remind you that those questions have nothing to do with the discussion you and I were having about "the way the system works." You were simply WRONG because this whole discussion has been CLEARLY about the birth-control mandate that Obama imposed last month, and you said Congress passed it. That is simply FALSE. Furthermore, that whole "it's how the system works" argument is a COP OUT and another distraction for you to avoid ADMITTING how you really feel about President Obama and the Democratic Party and the way they are trampling our Constitutional rights with the mandate.
Just quite DODGING, and ADMIT that they are DOING a lot more to earn terms like "POS...waste of air" than Rush Limbaugh, but that you won't call them such names, as you call him, because you are PARTISAN.
Gotcha Covered,
Lee Strickland
Strickland Marine Insurance Agency, Inc.
https://stricklandmarine.net
843-795-1000 / 800-446-1862 |
|
|
|
Mixed Nutz
Senior Member
3505 Posts |
Posted - 03/16/2012 : 8:34:37 PM
|
quote:
Originally posted by on a fishin mission
quote:
Originally posted by gotchacovered
quote:
Originally posted by on a fishin mission
quote:
Originally posted by gotchacovered
OnaFishinMission,
That is the quite possibly the silliest cop out/side-step I've ever heard one use to evade admitting that the beloved President, for whom you voted, and his party, are more worthy of your hateful words than even the "fat POS, waste of air" Rush.
First, I didn't ask you how the system works. We all know how it works, and that doesn't justify anything--especially when your beloved are abusing that system to stomp on the Constitution. I asked you what YOU think about the people PUSHING that particular agenda and making it a reality. That is 100% the Democratic Party, President Obama, and people like Sandra Fluke. You typically defend all three. You obviously can't be honest and criticize them as they deserve.
Second, and more importantly, YOU ARE WRONG about the "system" anyway. The birth-control mandate on Christian employers was not an act of Congress. It was an ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY, announced THIS YEAR by Kathleen Sebilius, head of the Department of Health and Human Services. After backlash from the public, it was altered through another ADMINISTRATIVE decision--not by a court or a Legislature. It is THAT that this fiasco is aimed at defending.
You need to get your facts straight, senior.
So, now, what you've told us ALL without realizing it, is that you support Democrats, and refuse to admit to their flaws, EVEN WHEN YOU KNOW they are trampling our Constitutional rights. You're "outraged" because a Conservative shock jockey called THEM names () over THAT gross abuse of the FUNDMENTALS of our liberty and CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, but you have the nerve to try and use the "it's her Constitutional right to speak" to defend Obama's activist against Rush's name-calling, based on the claim that it's "un-Christian"--all while you call Rush names like "POS" and "waste of air".
The display of hypocrisy is complete. You may now exit to stage left.
Gotcha Covered,
Lee Strickland
Strickland Marine Insurance Agency, Inc.
https://stricklandmarine.net
843-795-1000 / 800-446-1862
And how is this wrong about how our government works? Every president makes administrative policies and every congress can block those policies with 50 votes in the senate The senate tried to kill the contraceptive policy and only got 48 votes. That is the way it has worked for 100's of years. What part do you not understand. Now congress can amend the bill to kill the coverage and bring it back to the senate for another vote or it can send it to the supreme court.
Blunt, Romney's liaison to Congress, predicted the issue won't go away.
It "won't be over until the administration figures out how to accommodate people's religious views at it relates to these mandates," he told reporters after the vote. "This is a debate that might be settled at that building across the street," referring to ethe Supreme Court.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/story/2012-03-01/birth-control-politics/53313252/1
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/02/us/politics/senate-kills-gop-bill-opposing-contraception-policy.html?pagewanted=all
Even Fox news understands how our system works, even if they don't believe in the bill itself
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/03/01/first-senate-vote-looms-on-obama-birth-control-policy/
Lets be honest here, you are having a hard time understanding
how our government works, I thought this might help you understand, helped my 4 year old alot.
"Those who have the ability to make a difference have the responsibility to do so." Thomas Jefferson
"And how is this wrong about how our government works?"
It's wrong in that you said that CONGRESS installed the policy. You are WRONG. The PRESIDENT made the policy AFTER Congress passed Obamacare. Now, I fully expect you to spin your original comment as hard as possible, call me names, or make more false accusations about my understanding of how government works, in an attempt to hide your error, but intelligent readers aren't going to fall for it.
My desire is not to pound you for making a mistake, though. Everyone does. The point is that the President you elected is trampling on Constitutional rights and religious freedom, and you apparently can't criticize him for it. You call a Conservative radio host a "POS waste of air" for stating his opinions in metaphor about a left0wing activist who's trying to destroy the very foundation of our liberty, but you claim holier-than-thou status when called to analyze the true villains in the story.
Typical.
Oh, I almost forgot. Here's that picture you posted.
Yep, that's exactly the thing I'm defending from YOU here, as you stand up for those who use it as a condom on the American People.
Gotcha Covered,
Lee Strickland
Strickland Marine Insurance Agency, Inc.
https://stricklandmarine.net
843-795-1000 / 800-446-1862
Congress passed the bill and the administration added policy. It is still the way government works. You are arguing about details, all to which I say is how the government works.
Two questions for you and I want you to answer it. Did Congress break any laws in passing the healthcare bill? Yes or no please
Did the President break any laws in adding administrative policies to the bill? Yes or no.
"Those who have the ability to make a difference have the responsibility to do so." Thomas Jefferson
The U.S. Congress is supposed to "read" every word of "every" Bill, before voting on it.http://www.unpopulartruth.com/2009/04/congress-doesnt-read-bills-they-vote-on.html
Unless you are denying their fiduciary responsibilities?
...Politicians aren't the "Oldest Profession", but the results are still the same!!! |
Edited by - Mixed Nutz on 03/16/2012 9:06:17 PM |
|
|
|
Mixed Nutz
Senior Member
3505 Posts |
Posted - 03/16/2012 : 8:38:06 PM
|
DUDE, You really are hunting Hens Teeth now aren't you? verb, noun, pronoun, adjective, adverb???? You know the truth, and denying it doesn't help your argument!!!
Obama Care was passed before it was even printed as a Bill.
Remember Pulosi decrying that WE must PASS the BILL BEFORE WE'LL KNOW WHAT's IN IT???
...Politicians aren't the "Oldest Profession", but the results are still the same!!! |
Edited by - Mixed Nutz on 03/16/2012 8:49:09 PM |
|
|
|
Mixed Nutz
Senior Member
3505 Posts |
Posted - 03/16/2012 : 9:07:48 PM
|
Gotcha' 48. Fishinmission 0!
...Politicians aren't the "Oldest Profession", but the results are still the same!!! |
|
|
|
Mixed Nutz
Senior Member
3505 Posts |
Posted - 03/18/2012 : 10:24:22 PM
|
quote:
Originally posted by on a fishin mission
quote:
Originally posted by Mixed Nutz
I never meant sexual favors, but rather selling one's soul to the Democratic Party at the expense of the Constitution of the U.S.
Example:(prostitute) to devote to corrupt for unworthy purposes : debase <prostitute one's talents>
Now, how's that hat tasting?
I'm quite sure the the next time the PT Pulosi,'Bama and Biden Circus comes around, she'll play a much higher role.
Maybe Ring Leader rather than Freak Show?
...Politicians aren't the "Oldest Profession", but the results are still the same!!!
Very good use of merriam webster.com. Now you should go back there and find out the difference in a noun and a verb. In the sentence She's a "SLUT", "prostitute", or a "Jesabelle", (according to Gospel) bought and paid for by the Democratic Party!! slut, prostitute and jesabelle are all nouns. the definition of a prostitute as a noun is
1 : a woman who engages in promiscuous sexual intercourse especially for money : whore b : a male who engages in sexual and especially ********** practices for money
2
: a person (as a writer or painter) who deliberately debases his or her talents (as for money)
The definition of a slut is
1
chiefly British : a slovenly woman
2
a : a promiscuous woman; especially : prostitute
You, sir, used all of those words as nouns, which is slander. So until you can prove to me she is a prostitute or a slut, you are dead ass wrong!!!
Good try though!
"Those who have the ability to make a difference have the responsibility to do so." Thomas Jefferson
So, let's say that Flukes, as an activists, prostitutes (verb) herself to the Democratic Party, for undisclosed fortunes, or for nothing but a promise of future grandeur. Wouldn't that in itself make her a prostitute (noun)??
Please prove me dead a$$ wrong sir!!
By the way,I chose Britannica over Webster.
...Politicians aren't the "Oldest Profession", but the results are still the same!!! |
|
|
|
gotchacovered
Prolific Poster
18081 Posts |
Posted - 03/19/2012 : 12:06:16 PM
|
Below is the second-funniest and second-most hypocritical post of the whole thread.
quote:
Originally posted by on a fishin mission
Congress however passed this legislation, the senate tried to block it and did not succeed. I believe if it makes it to the Supreme Court, or a lesser, it will not be upheld. THIS IS HOW OUR GOVERNMENT WORKS! If you don't believe in the way the system works, get the **** out.
OK, now, the guy who just said that is the same guy who said his whole purpose here is to defend Sandra Fluke's "Constitutional right to speak" without being called names. That is what HE says to people who disagree with him on HIS partisan politics. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's an "outrage" for activists like Sandra Fluke to be called names by radio shock jockeys(GASP!) for making their partisan pitches to steal our Constitutional religious freedoms, but let an average Conservative speak his piece on the web about Obama's un-Constitutional policy, and BLAM, he needs to "get the ***** out!" Yes, they want us to leave the country again. LOL. Oh, yes, this shows us that OnaFishinMission is soooooooo devoted to respecting people's right to speak their political opinions. LOL!!
(Psssst, he doesn't even realize that Congress did NOT pass the subject legislation (birth-control coverage by the Church), because the President did that all by himself. He says that's just splitting hairs, but he wants to quibble with Mixed Nutz about nouns versus adjectives. LOL. Don't tell him.)
OK, that statement is only second in hypocisy and humor to this next one.
quote:
Originally posted by on a fishin mission
Rush is a hypocritical, piece of shat junkie! A total waste of air!
I hope Sandra Fluke sues his oxycotin eating fat ass!
INDEED, we CLEARLY have a man of PRINCIPLE here.*
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
If Liberals only knew how transparent they are.
Gotcha Covered,
Lee Strickland
Strickland Marine Insurance Agency, Inc.
https://stricklandmarine.net
843-795-1000 / 800-446-1862 |
Edited by - gotchacovered on 03/19/2012 12:10:54 PM |
|
|
|
hhi angler
Senior Member
2131 Posts |
Posted - 03/19/2012 : 3:38:28 PM
|
| I believe the skinny socialist slid in the rest of the Catholic Church operations Friday evening between money grubbing events. All in a day of the dictators never ending edicts. |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
|
|
You win some, and you lose some....
