Hot off the Press...


Media has a 91% negative coverage of Trump.

Like no one knew this already. Glad not everyone believes everything the media feeds us. Wish more would wake up to the bias in news reporting.

Also new poll is saying President has one of the most Rock Solid bases of any past president.

Now let's get to the bottom of our crooked FBI leaders.









Why Bruce?... the ramblings of a disillusioned Hillary supporter.
Originally posted by poly ball

I believe Fred could witness trump pissing on an old homeless lady, and he'd tell him he's doing a hell of a job, really soaking her.
Replies

What is mediabiasfactcheck.com and who’s behind it?

https://www.conservapedia.com/Media_Bias_Fact_Check

https://www.quora.com/How-trustworthy-is-the-site-called-Media-Bias-Fact-Check

isn’t it a bipartisan belief that there is/was corruption in Ukraine? Seems to be plenty of news reports indicating there was and the Senate is investigating Ukraine corruption along with the DOJ.

I hope we find the 1.8 billion dollars of Americans tax payers money and Ukraine’s gold

I like this idea, RBF.

If applied in a way that would put/keep us in the best position during a transition. The gov't sucks at this, just like our large corporations, IMO. Right folks in the right job, regardless of race or a degree that has them educated beyond their capacity. I've witnessed a lot of that in the last several years.

As long as both sides of the isle are making money, never happen. Have to say, with as much as Obama let our military decline, Trump had to spend a heap to get us back to where we needed to be.

Without crunching numbers, as I have no idea on that, what would it save?? A lot of our soldiers for sure that are killed overseas. Let alone the ones that come home and commit suicide or living a life thinking about it.....

Well said, RBF, as you usually suckangry

NN

Not sure why it didn't include your quote......site is crazy...



Last edited by DoubleN

I'm not offering any excuses. No way can Trump do it on his own. No matter what he may have said. He knows now he was wrong. Now all he has to do is get Congress together and support him. I also hope he brings up our national debt and ways to fix it. You asked me earlier about ways to do it..... Wish I knew and if I did probably wouldn't matter to anyone.

I know for fact that we waste way too much money on our Military. Before you go twisting this statement. No I don't think we need to down size. Just streamline. You should see the fuel and parts we waste when it comes to the end of the fiscal year just to "meet" budget. Instead of keeping skills sharp on warfare "games" do useful real time training on our boarders and all the shipments of drugs coming into our country.

And the biggest thing I'd love to see is putting all Congressmen and Women on S.S. and the obuma health care system along with term limits. Originally posted by Fred67


First, I won't twist your statements on the military, but I do have a question... Define downsizing? Personnel, or equipment? I believe we should "downsize" both, and especially the outdated warfare equipment...

We need to ask ourselves what does war look like in the future and if we do what you applaud Drumpf for which is to be non-interventionist, then we don't need all they heavy/expensive equipment... We just need to make sure we have the capabilities to ramp up production quickly... We built a crap pile of war machines during WWII and should be prepared to do it again, but not actually carry the inventory...

Soldiers/active military these days, except for the elite special forces, are in my opinion wasteful as well. I support a robust and vigorous reserves campaign and enhanced training model for these folks so we can activate them quickly... Sure, we will have to keep a core amount of the full time folks to keep things operating efficiently and effectively, but could reduce there as well without any issue if we change the overall military model to lean and mean...

I believe a well funded lean military model is actually better than what we have today... Well funded means giving the folks the best equipment to do their jobs, but having a smaller overall military force... Lean, mean, and only the best will do... Our strategic focus and advantage should be technology and not bloated staffs with full time personnel, and outdated equipment to maintain...

Again, nothing against the military as I appreciate these folks as much as anyone else... However, we do tend to throw money and bodies at our problems rather than to find better/more effective operating models....


RBFOriginally posted by Richard Beer Froth


I like this idea, RBF.

If applied in a way that would put/keep us in the best position during a transition. The gov't sucks at this, just like our large corporations, IMO. Right folks in the right job, regardless of race or a degree that has them educated beyond their capacity. I've witnessed a lot of that in the last several years.

As long as both sides of the isle are making money, never happen. Have to say, with as much as Obama let our military decline, Trump had to spend a heap to get us back to where we needed to be.

Without crunching numbers, as I have no idea on that, what would it save?? A lot of our soldiers for sure that are killed overseas. Let alone the ones that come home and commit suicide or living a life thinking about it.....

Well said, RBF, as you usually suckthumbsUp

NN

Last edited by DoubleN

I like this idea, RBF.

If applied in a way that would put/keep us in the best position during a transition. The gov't sucks at this, just like our large corporations, IMO. Right folks in the right job, regardless of race or a degree that has them educated beyond their capacity. I've witnessed a lot of that in the last several years.

As long as both sides of the isle are making money, never happen. Have to say, with as much as Obama let our military decline, Trump had to spend a heap to get us back to where we needed to be.

Without crunching numbers, as I have no idea on that, what would it save?? A lot of our soldiers for sure that are killed overseas. Let alone the ones that come home and commit suicide or living a life thinking about it.....

Well said, RBF, as you usually suckthumbsUp

NN
Originally posted by DoubleN


Awwwe, ole Double ChiNN giving RBF praise because he is right again...

https://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/expanding-the-military-budget-is-wasteful-and-unnecessary/

Here is the source bias rating just so you don't claim it is Dem:

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-american-conservative/

Obama brought spending down because we were withdrawing from war... Why do why need to spend all this money if we aren't at war? Seriously, what is the point? It is absolutely absurd someone believes that wanting to reduce the size of the military is a bad thing to help balance our budget... It is by far our largest expenditure and is very wasteful... Our military isn't organizationally lean and agile... Geez man, we have naval ships running into each other, and other non-military vessels...

Our biggest threat isn't from the outside, but the inside, and until you partisan hacks realize you are a part of the inside threat we will keep going down the road of terminal decline...




RBF
What is mediabiasfactcheck.com and who’s behind it?

https://www.conservapedia.com/Media_Bias_Fact_Check

https://www.quora.com/How-trustworthy-is-the-site-called-Media-Bias-Fact-Check

Originally posted by Bayrider7365


Conservapedia is a joke...

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/conservapedia/

Funny about your quora link because here is one of the comments:

"I’ve looked far and wide for good ratings of media sources. Media Bias / Fact Check is the best one I’ve been able to find. The Allsides chart is decent, but it’s almost criminal that they leave out the media source I consider to be the standard by which all other media sources should be judged, The Economist (update, they include it now, but as left of center, which I think is inaccurate)."

Thanks for proving RBF right again... Hahaha

You are desperate and nothing but a closet socialist milking the government socialist program money...

The RePeter can't even get his own sources to back up his claims...



RBF
Last edited by Richard Beer Froth

I like this idea, RBF.

If applied in a way that would put/keep us in the best position during a transition. The gov't sucks at this, just like our large corporations, IMO. Right folks in the right job, regardless of race or a degree that has them educated beyond their capacity. I've witnessed a lot of that in the last several years.

As long as both sides of the isle are making money, never happen. Have to say, with as much as Obama let our military decline, Trump had to spend a heap to get us back to where we needed to be.

Without crunching numbers, as I have no idea on that, what would it save?? A lot of our soldiers for sure that are killed overseas. Let alone the ones that come home and commit suicide or living a life thinking about it.....

Well said, RBF, as you usually suckthumbsUp

NN

Originally posted by DoubleN


Double ChiNN, some of what I posted before wasn't directed to you personally. They were general comments to the group... They prolly sucked...bigsmile

I will post some more on my thoughts tomorrow, or later in the week... I am sorta passionate about the topic, and our military folks... They beez great people...


RBF



Awwwe, ole Double ChiNN giving RBF praise because he is right again...



Why do why need to spend all this money if we aren't at war? Seriously, what is the point? It is absolutely absurd someone believes that wanting to reduce the size of the military is a bad thing to help balance our budget... It is by far our largest expenditure and is very wasteful... Our military isn't organizationally lean and agile... Geez man, we have naval ships running into each other, and other non-military vessels...

Our biggest threat isn't from the outside, but the inside, and until you partisan hacks realize you are a part of the inside threat we will keep going down the road of terminal decline...




RBFOriginally posted by Richard Beer Froth


You never cease to stay the same A hole. someone agrees to an extent with you and you take a mile and add your own twist. The point to keeping our military strong during non-war periods is to avoid war! Accidents happen in every aspect of life, granted they should not. You got the biggest threat almost right. Outside influence on our inside through subversion to turn America into a total Socialist country.

What do you think the newly forming Space Force is all about. It has been fought for for decades, Trump finally has the gumption to push it into working order. Just imagine no need for our huge navel fleet or bases overseas. Just target anywhere in the World in a matter of seconds. Remember when the media crucified Reagan for the Strategic Defense Initiative which they labeled "star wars"? Don't think China and Russia are sitting still. We need our military, and yes it does need to be streamlined. I'd dare say that li'll Kim would have gotten a taste of it, if he would have not calmed down. You need to loose some of that hate despise for Trump my friend. smile


I think you and Warren would get along well with those forked tongues.
Really...SpaceForce is not something new, been around for some 15+ years prior.

Furthermore, trump is about as clueless to space, as was his incoherent answer about Musk.


KERNEN: Tesla's now worth more than GM and Ford. Do you have comments on Elon Musk?

TRUMP: Well -- you have to give him credit. I spoke to him very recently, and he's also doing the rockets. He likes rockets. And -- he does good at rockets too, by the way. I never saw where the engines come down with no wings, no anything, and they're landing. I said I've never seen that before. And I was worried about him, because he's one of our great geniuses, and we have to protect our genius. You know, we have to protect Thomas Edison and we have to protect all of these people that -- came up with originally the light bulb and -- the wheel and all of these things. And he's one of our very smart people and we want to-- we want to cherish those people.

You never cease to stay the same A hole. someone agrees to an extent with you and you take a mile and add your own twist. The point to keeping our military strong during non-war periods is to avoid war! Accidents happen in every aspect of life, granted they should not. You got the biggest threat almost right. Outside influence on our inside through subversion to turn America into a total Socialist country.

What do you think the newly forming Space Force is all about. It has been fought for for decades, Trump finally has the gumption to push it into working order. Just imagine no need for our huge navel fleet or bases overseas. Just target anywhere in the World in a matter of seconds. Remember when the media crucified Reagan for the Strategic Defense Initiative which they labeled "star wars"? Don't think China and Russia are sitting still. We need our military, and yes it does need to be streamlined. I'd dare say that li'll Kim would have gotten a taste of it, if he would have not calmed down. You need to loose some of that hate despise for Trump my friend. smile

I think you and Warren would get along well with those forked tongues. Originally posted by Fred67


Oh Alfredo, why didn't you call out Double ChiNN for saying I usually suck? Nope, I only responded in kind to his remarks...

Your thinking is so outdated, and the reason we spend so much on the military... No, having a strong military doesn't keep us out of wars... We have the strongest, and we are still constantly in wars... Your argument "doesn't hold water." See Alfredo, the problem is we start these wars because we have a huge military... Gotta justify having it, and the best way is to use it occasionally and scare up everyone into supporting more spending... Gotta keep that military industrial complex going...

Also, your comments about Space Force are wrong too... We keep bases around the world to have boots and equipment on the ground to quickly deploy/react, and it has practically nothing to do with missiles. We already have the capability to launch from just about anywhere, to anywhere in the world, if we want to drop a few... Helps to be closer for accuracy, but chunk enough missiles overseas and some will find their target...

Reality is Russia, China, and India already have ASAT capabilities... More countries will follow now that we have a "Space Force"... Reality is satellites are much easy to hit and destroy with a missile, than it is to stop a missile with a missile... First time we use satellite warfare the Sats will start getting destroyed and creating lots of debris which will collide with other satellites.... Sounds exciting...

It is so sad to see you hate the Dems so much you would vote for Drumpf who didn't even know what the "nuclear triad" was... I know they must have hurt you bad in the past because you hate them so much.... Must be because you were/are a Democrat, so it stings a little more for you personally...wink

Oh, forgot to mention. My comments about our greatest threats being from within. I didn't say that correctly, and yes, the outside influence turning us against one another is our greatest threat... Ole Vlad wanted Drumpf just for that job, and the Russians and China are just sitting back and letting us rot from within... Their strategy is working rather well... They'll support old Drumpf again to keep it going as Drumpf is their best weapon...


RBF
Last edited by Richard Beer Froth
Dang good vid about fairness, reciprocity and common sense in dealing with China

https://youtu.be/g1BbswU3i10